The Brand Illusion
I recently read with great interest the National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) “2009 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers.”
One thing that really stood out as I read the NAR Profile is that, when it comes to the factors people emphasize when selecting a Realtor, brand/company is not very important.
Let me say that again: when it comes to the factors people emphasize when selecting a Realtor, brand/company is not very important.
The people polled were asked to name the “most important factors” they considered when choosing an agent. The chart below, which I excerpted directly from the NAR Profile, details the responses.
In fact, of all the reasons given, “agent’s association with a particular firm” is considered the most important factor only 3% of the time.
Let me repeat that: of all the reasons given, “agent’s association with a particular firm” is considered the most important factor only 3% of the time.
Further, of all the reasons given, “agent’s association with a particular firm” was the second LEAST important. All these other factors were considered more important than the company/brand with which the agent was associated:
- Honesty and trustworthiness
- Reputation of agent
- Agent is friend or family member
- Agent’s knowledge of neighborhood
- Agent has caring personality/good listener
- Other
This proves what I’ve known – based on professional experience – for a very long time: people choose agents based on the AGENT’S reputation and attributes, NOT the company’s or the brand’s.
Speaking from my personal perspective, I’ve worked at a little regional company, two of the top four brands in the world, and now I own my own franchise. And I can tell you this: with absolute, unequivocal certainty, my clients do not care where I work.
My clients know me by (1) my name, and (2) my reputation and (3) my cell phone number.
It begins and ends with these three basic pieces of information.
Game. Set. Match.
In fact, I still get calls from clients who will occasionally say “How long have you been gone from RE/MAX”? Ummm…nine years, give or take? Or “When did you leave KW? Let’s see…seven years ago, approximately?
Further, not one time in the nearly 20 years I’ve been in real estate has a client chosen me because of brand affiliation.
NOT ONCE!
I discussed this topic with Judy Moriarty (@RealEstateChick) recently, and here were her thoughts:
Having been a broker at a small regional firm and a well-known national franchise, I have been on both “brand” wagons. My experience has shown me that it doesn’t matter whether there’s a balloon, a yellow jacket or a family behind the agent – the consumer hires a particular agent because they like and trust that person and as long as it brings traffic, they really don’t care whose sign is in their yard. Further, the internet has leveled the playing field for this industry. It’s no longer about who has the biggest TV presence or ad in the Sunday paper or how many pages you have in the local color real estate magazine – it’s about instant accessibility to information by consumers. Whoever provides the information in the most accurate and quickest fashion gets the business. Today’s tech savvy agents can create beautiful on-line marketing exposure for their sellers in a very cost effective manner, which will also draw in new buyers without the weight of the brand around them. It is then up to that agent to establish and build on a personal relationship that will keep that client.
Jay Thompson (@phxREguy) echoed these sentiments on Twitter recently:
I followed up with Jay and asked him for any additional thoughts on this point. Here’s what he said:
My favorite display of “consumers don’t care about the brand” goes back a few years to when I worked at a Century 21 franchise. I engaged with many clients over the internet or telephone before I first met them face-to-face. I wish I’d kept count of how many said, after I first met them and handed them a business card, “Oh, you’re with Century 21?” In other words, they had no idea. And they obviously didn’t care. They chose me for whatever reason — knowledge, trust, personality, some intangible thing — who knows. But obviously they didn’t select me because of my affiliation with a particular brand… There is little, if any, differentiation between real estate brands. In my opinion, the VAST majority of real estate buyers and sellers don’t select an agent based on the logo on their business card. It just doesn’t matter to them.
The point: Judy’s clients work with Judy because of Judy, Jay’s clients work with Jay because of Jay and my clients work with me because of me.
And if you look at the reasons detailed above that ARE considered the “most important” when choosing a Realtor, 97% have absolutely NOTHING to do with brand or company. They are ALL “individual agent characteristic” in nature.
The takeaway: successful agents ARE their own brand, and that is the brand that you as a successful real estate professional should be cultivating. YOURS.
UPDATE | See “The Brand Illusion | Part 2” for additional commentary…





Interesting article. Thanks for sharing – I work for an independent real estate firm so this type of information is always interesting to me. Because my department handles all of our Internet requests for showing I am very aware of how important the Internet is to buyers today. Sellers are finally figuring it out as well.
This comment was originally posted on The Real Estate Bloggers
I agree, almost 100%.
Here’s the thing. I agree 100% with the idea that a super-star agent (in the eyes of citizens) is immune to Brand Identity, meaning, it doesn’t matter which Brand they are with (unless the citizen perceives that Brand as BAD and there is an equally qualified choice with a superior Brand).
For the less than super-star or an agent who has not earned a reputation for being remarkable, the Brand Association may play a subconscious role in their selection. In our market and according to Buyer/Seller Surveys from HAR, 60% to 70% of the sellers consider 2 agents before selecting. Brand association could subconscious play a role in tight competitions.
For example, if you were a no-name agent, working with a no-name company, and you were competing for a listing with another no-name agent, associated with a respected Brand name, the Brand name association would help that agent win, all else being equal (if it ever is?)
To me, it’s sort like institutional advertising, nobody claims to purchase based on effective advertising, but I do believe that effective institutional advertising/promotions/marketing can be an effective positioning tool/strategy/method.
Another example that pops into my head, Kobe with the LA Lakers. He’d be super-star on any team, in any market, but with the Lakers and their market and their Brand and their history, he’s an even brighter star. Brighter than if he played with the Raptors or the Thunder?
Bottom line, for me, I agree 99% of the decisions are made based on the perceived value of the agent and I believe that Brand Association plays a subconscious role. A good Brand can’t hurt you, it can help you. A bad Brand association can hurt even a super-star (provided there is a perceived equal alternative with a better Brand). A bland Brand, may not help you, but it could hurt you too.
My 27 cents. Nice post and thanks for sharing.
“the real estate world that branding is less and less important for homebuyers as the internet is providing a more effective way to vet real estate agents than the associated brand.”
I couldn’t agree more. The big brands like Century 21, Prudential and Remax could find it difficult to keep their brick and mortar model successful. With more and more real estate agents looking to cut costs just to stay in business, these brand name companies will continue to lose agents as they move to other real estate firms who don’t charge these high fees.
This comment was originally posted on The Real Estate Bloggers
I’m absolutely going to stay up till all hours imagining what I want to be branded as. Besides entertainment for all the males in my life who call me when they are bored and I’m running out of funny stuff to say.
The Mayor´s last blog ..He Had Me At Hello: Harry Connick Jr At Bllissdom
When @PhxREguy talks…people REACT! Gr8 thread re RE branding at http://budurl.com/5rqa :: #RTB #BRANDILLUSION :: http://cli.gs/XzW5p
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
This has been the best blog I have read about Branding! I am associated with a local brokerage company, I get clients by selling myself and delievering service and support no other agent would even consider. I am there for my clients 24/7 with a smile on my face.
Sandy,
Thanks for your kind words. After 20 years in the real estate game, I can tell you that your success begins and ends with YOU.
Can a brokerage add value? Absolutely.
But my view is that – no matter where you work – at the end of the day, it’s “95% agent/5% brokerage-brand.”
We appreciate your comment, and keep “raising the bar” by delivering that exceptional service to each and every one of your clients…
Best,
Michael
The Brand Illusion Parts 1 & 2 :: http://cli.gs/XzW5p :: http://cli.gs/PqHg7
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
I would not get too comfortable with the NAR’s 3% finding. If they are surveying sellers who have been involved with an agent [as opposed to people who may not be in the market], it is not surprising that the company is not at the top of their list. After all they just spent many weeks dealing with a person, i.e. an agent. That statistic may only mean that 97% of the time, sellers are happy with their agent. If you’ll notice, all other categories except “Other” pertain to the agent. At that stage, it is to be expected that the seller is focused on the agent, not the company.
Tyler Webb
Associate Broker
Champion Realty
Annapolis, MD
http://www.recrab.com
@recrab
Great article and I couldn’t agree more. I think we are going to see more and more agents realize this over the coming years and either start their own companies or affliate themselves with smaller brokerages offering better splits and running more efficiently. What is funny is that the consumer is way ahead of the agents on this one. Most agents still don’t get it that brand matters so little nowadays. They will come around.
Interesting article. Thanks for sharing – I work for an independent real estate firm so this type of information is always interesting to me. Because my department handles all of our Internet requests for showing I am very aware of how important the Internet is to buyers today. Sellers are finally figuring it out as well.
This comment was originally posted on The Real Estate Bloggers
“the real estate world that branding is less and less important for homebuyers as the internet is providing a more effective way to vet real estate agents than the associated brand.”
I couldn’t agree more. The big brands like Century 21, Prudential and Remax could find it difficult to keep their brick and mortar model successful. With more and more real estate agents looking to cut costs just to stay in business, these brand name companies will continue to lose agents as they move to other real estate firms who don’t charge these high fees.
This comment was originally posted on The Real Estate Bloggers
Rob, as always you bring deep, thoughtful content to the surface for the rest of us who depend on you to do it. Obviously, it would be preferable if you would utilize the http://www.century21.com media center version links http://www.century21.com/aboutus/news.jsp?id=81 when referencing our survey work, but thank you just the same for including it.
I think the exploration of what the real estate model of the future looks like is fascinating. I understand all the arguments with regard to agents depending on the “big brand” for legal, office and administrative support; however, to put out a blanket statement like “But the general sentiment around the industry is that the brand of the brokerage doesn’t matter one bit,” is just not backed up by any facts.
I get the sense that the entire piece centers on how technology has leveled he playing field in service / knowledge based industries to the point where the qualified individual doesn’t need any brand or branding to be successful. I think the executives on Madison Ave. would disagree. The piece seems to hint that brands and brand value in general are quickly becoming a thing of the past. I just don’t agree with this sentiment. As the franchisor of the world’s largest residential real estate sales organization, Century 21 Real Estate continues to provide advantages of scale when it comes to online marketing and technology platforms.
In my opinion the brand and the agent work hand in hand to provide the consumer with the best possible experience. The brand continues to attract consumers to visit offices, pick up the phone, complete an online contact form or send an email and the performance of the broker and agent fulfill the brand value proposition.
I applaud HAR for their efforts to espouse transparency for agent performance.
This comment was originally posted on The Notorious R.O.B.
Hey Matt — thanks for the comment. You know, I could have sworn I wrote something like, “such sentiments are unfair and not grounded in provable facts” referring to the general statement. I think I must have deleted that in editing that part down a bit….
You’re right; as yet, no one really knows whether brands do or don’t matter. More importantly, it is unclear if we’re even talking about the same thing when we say that a brand “matters”. This is something I’d like to get into more in the next two parts.
Give Rick my best regards.
-rsh
This comment was originally posted on The Notorious R.O.B.
True, what you say about franchisees. I was thinking more of the actual Big Brokerages like a Long & Foster or Weichert, and less of the franchise brands like Coldwell Banker and Century 21.
As for realtors who have no interest or idea on how to use it… well, they’d be in the same boat no matter what size the brokerage firm is.
-rsh
This comment was originally posted on The Notorious R.O.B.
Couple quick thoughts…
1. I agree with the general premise of your post…with the industrial age now firmly in the past and the information age tearing at conventional real estate practices across the board, especially at ‘Big Real Estate’…disintermediation and the term (from the book of the same name) Blown To Bits rings loud and clear.
2. Really, my only contention with what you have written here, Rob, is your choice of photos, which I don’t think plays to the points of your post. You have one Maurice Jones Drew, a small running back by NFL standards, indeed. But he’s running against the Buffalo Bills not so vaunted defense. So surely you could have found a picture of MJD running against say the Ravens or even your dear Jersey/2, err, I mean Jets defense to better illustrate your point.
**Disclaimer: I’m a Buffalo Bills fan. And I have this feeling Rob was sitting back laughing when he chose this photo. Thanks Rob.
This comment was originally posted on The Notorious R.O.B.
Dude, that’s Posluzny and Stroud that MJD is running past… the Bills defense might be meh, but those two guys are rock-solid.
I’ll trade you Vernon Gholston and Matt Kroul for Pos and Stroud every day of the week, and twice on weekends….
-rsh
This comment was originally posted on The Notorious R.O.B.
Thats Pos and Aaron Schobel, the latter of which is still no slouch. Point taken, like castor oil…*sigh*
You can keep Ghost-on and who ever Matt Kroul is, we’re trying to upgrade to respectability my man…
This comment was originally posted on The Notorious R.O.B.
This is an awesome article! I agree with the points you make here. One thing I think you could explore a bit more is the effect of “big brands” on the quality of agents. In other words, if well known big brokerages are attracting more of the top talent, does that fact – in combination with the brand recognition itself – come into play in garnering more of the market share? Where do the most skilled and productive agents choose to hang their license? Large brokerages have relied, from my observation, on high body counts of new and low producing agents and retaining an aging agent population that have long term relationships that produce repeat business and referrals.
I do agree that all of this is changing – quickly. There is less and less advantage to being large, and the staggering operational overhead means turning to sources outside the transaction itself for company dollar. If there is an advantage at all to large brokerage, it’s their spin-off of affiliated services in mortgage, title, insurance, etc. for the profit margins. Small brokerages and independents are literally living off the dollar generated on the transaction itself. Big brokerage has developed additional streams of revenue. Just thought I would toss that out for consideration.
This comment was originally posted on The Notorious R.O.B.