#RTB | Raising the Bar | How High?!?

Sometime in September of 2009, before I ever saw or heard of the #RTB hashtag on Twitter, I had a lengthy Twitter exchange with Stefan Swanepoel (@Swanepoel). We were talking about the need for an increase in the level of professionalism in real estate. Here’s my best recollection of the conclusion of our dialogue:

  • Swanepoel: “I don’t see anyone really leading on this issue.”
  • Me: “I think a company just needs to stand up and lead by example. I think it’s that simple.”

Since that first exchange with Stefan, I’ve spent a lot of time interacting with people within the real estate industry to discuss the issue of #RTB, or “raising the bar.”

This blog is full of blog posts that my partner Todd Waller (@ToddWaller) and I have written relating to the #RTB movement, because we feel it is critical to the long-term success and viability of the industry as we know it today. We even founded and host a weekly blogtalkradio.com show called “#RTB on the Radio” to try to engage people and create momentum for this movement (you can listen to our past shows by clicking in the box to the right of this sentence).

And, at times, I think we’re making a difference. We’ve had some wonderful, amazing guests on the show, and we’ve had some fantastic blog threads and extended conversations with people all over America, from New York to Texas to Tennessee to Virginia to California and just about everywhere in between.

And, to be candid, there are other times when we think that real estate is like an enormous supertanker that is simply way too big to turn in any meaningful way, and that it’s destined to keep on going in its current direction, come what may (“come what may” covering the gamut from “the industry will take care of itself, relax” to “Titanic, Part Deux”).

Having invested this time and interacted with hundreds of people, here are the things we feel that we’ve learned so far:

  • There is an incredible, almost overwhelming lack of cohesion within the industry. We cannot think of any industry that is more fragmented than ours. Get five people involved in a conversation on what should be done to raise the bar in real estate – even if they all agree that raising the bar is of paramount importance – and you’ll get five different opinions on how best to accomplish that goal. Realizing this – and it does NOT take long to figure this out – makes having any hope for consensus-building a real challenge.

  • There is a high level of denial within the industry. Let me be to the one to say this: THE EXCEPTION DOES NOT DISPROVE THE RULE.  Just because you know a few great agents with no education (and we know many too!) does NOT mean that having an educational requirement is a bad thing. Just because more education or a higher barrier to entry won’t solve every issue doesn’t mean that these are not inherently good things. Just because no solution is going to be a magic bullet for all that ails the real estate industry does not mean that we shouldn’t be pursuing the obvious, common sense changes that could and likely would improve the level of professionalism in real estate. Finally, pointing out that others are also rated poorly in the Harris Polls is just plain lame. So what if people think poorly of other service providers? Why are we concerned with that? We *should ONLY be* concerned with how WE are perceived. Nothing else matters!
  • We are not seeing leadership from the top of the real estate industry. We don’t want to open this Pandora’s Box, but it simply must be said: major industry insiders/players are conspicuous by their absence and silence. Maybe they are leading and we just don’t know where to look to see evidence of that leadership. But given all the buzz about #RTB in Social Media, we *think* we would have stumbled across some evidence of such leadership at some point. So far? *crickets*

The point of reiterating all these things? To get to this conclusion: we are not optimistic that the industry will “fix itself” as so many – particularly those with a vested interest in protecting the status quo – love to say.

When I read what Glenn Kellman of Redfin had to say on this point, I stopped what I was doing, I sat down and I wrote this post, because he confirmed what I had been feeling for quite some time. Please read Kellman’s entire commentary, because it is excellent, but here is the key excerpt to which I am referring:

“The industry can’t fix its relationship with consumers because it’s still so busy arguing with itself: about what agents should pay brokerages, about what brokerages should give agents, about who promotes whom. Every time I start to think that real estate will sort itself out, I go to a conference of brokers and panic, because I’ve never seen so many professionals invest all their passion in topics that have nothing to do with the customer.”

And now I find myself right back where I started my pursuit of #RTB, and to where I started this post.

“You must be the change you want to see in the world.” ~ Ghandi

After several months of research and focus groups and office meetings (and – to be honest – shouting matches) about the balance between, on one hand, our global desire for growth, and, on the other, our insistence upon professionalism, excellence and quality of service, we reached a meeting of the minds among our core management group.

And a bit of advice I received a few years ago from Rich Sheridan of Menlo Innovations proved invaluable during this process:

“In order to build your brand, you MUST make your “inside equal your outside.” That is, your image must actually BE who you are at your core, because people will immediately see through the facade if there is a disconnect.  And if there is a disjunct between your “inside” and your “outside,” your brand will be meaningless and end up having no value.”

And when NAR’s OWN STATS show that brand is the “most important” factor when choosing an agent only 3% of the time (!?!), it’s fairly clear that real estate as a whole has done a collectively poor job of creating brand images that resonate with the public.

Hmm…I think we’ve seen this somewhere else, haven’t we? (UPDATED: And here.)

So, we took stock of (1) what and who we are at our core, and (2) the image that we want to project to the outside world. And, low and behold, we discovered that they were one and the same.

The missing piece? We simply hadn’t articulated or defined the bar/barrier to entry that we had already subconsciously created!

And our bar/barrier to entry is higher – MUCH higher – than what the industry itself has created.

Without further adieu, here it is. To become a Professional One real estate professional from this day forth, an agent must satisfy all of the following requirements:

  • Possess a college diploma (four-year degree), OR a broker’s license OR five years of documented full-time experience as a real estate professional.
  • Pass the Future Achievement International “Merit Profile” character assessment (this is an assessment which measures 10 character competencies and four behavioral traits and provides a scoring for an individual’s attitudes, beliefs and commitments).
  • Have a clean record of professional service (no ethics charges, no unfavorable litigation, etc.).
  • Have at least three letters of recommendation from other Realtors.
  • Have at least three letters of recommendation from past clients.
  • Pass an interview with three existing Professional One Realtors.
  • Agree to use our proprietary listing syndication method on every listing (this requires lots of effort, but the results are SO worth it).
  • Agree to the Professional One “Mission Statements and Core Values” to the LETTER, 100% of the time, with zero exceptions…ever.

This is our definition of “raising the bar.”

This is our definition of “real estate professional.”

This is a branding message that we think will appeal to our target audience: our CLIENTS, the people who use our agents to help them buy and sell homes.

Have we gone TOO far with this? Are we using TOO NARROW a gateway or TOO FINE a filter?

To be honest, we don’t care.

We believe that uniform, consistent delivery of quality service is the ONLY WAY to create legitimate brand equity.

This isn’t about being BIG. We’re more than happy to let the behemoths tell you how “they’re number 1!”

This is ALL ABOUT providing a legitimate PROFESSIONAL SERVICE EXPERIENCE for each and every client that graces us with their business. Service like you’d get at a top-tier law firm or a “Big Four” accounting firm.

I experienced that type of “uniform service delivery” during the decade I spent in public accounting before I got into real estate, so I know that it’s possible.

The formula for providing that consistently excellent level of service was stunningly simple: you create the highest barrier to entry in your industry…and you build your business with the people talented and experienced and smart enough to want to be associated with that premium brand image…and you let your clients – again, the public – understand what you’re doing with a consistently delivered and articulated branding message.

We’ve raised our bar…

When are YOU going to step up?





Trackbacks Comments
  • New at P1Fran.com: #RTB :: Raising the Bar :: How High?!? (http://cli.gs/mUaPZ)

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • @tobyboyce I’ve come to realize that the most realistic #RTB option is to “raise your own darn bar” | We’re doing that | http://cli.gs/mUaPZ

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Have we gone TOO far with this? Are we using TOO NARROW a gateway or TOO FINE a filter?
    To be honest, we don’t care.
    We believe that uniform, consistent delivery of quality service is the ONLY WAY to create legitimate brand equity.

    I think the only way to raise your bar is setting a starting point to begin with … You now have that. Well done.

    Make sure the rest of your system is as well-defined as your hiring practice. More importantly, hold your staff to your system so you stay consistent and produce consistent results. With the nature of the normal brokerage model, that I the hardest part to do as far as I can tell.

    It’s the consistency that builds the brand … for better or for worse. Know that I, for one, am watching and rooting for you guys.
    .-= James Malanowski´s last blog ..THE RISE AND FALL OF THE BIG-BOX BROKERAGE =-.

    • James,

      Thanks for the kind words, the support and the advice.

      And I agree: this is ALL ABOUT uniformity and consistency of everything we do. As Marc Davison of 1000 Watt Consulting wrote in a post several years ago (I’m paraphrasing here), “real estate brands are not a single brand, they are the thousands of individual brands of the agents that work at that brand.” And he was and is entirely correct about that.

      That being said, it’s no wonder that every major franchise has been diluted as they’ve grown and had their brand images softened and diffused at the whim of the branding choices at the agent level.

      At the end of the day, you have to make a choice at the franchisor level: control your brand image, or let go of that control. We think it’s a major strategic mistake to let go of that control, and we say that NOT just from the selfish perspective of owners. We say it because we are protecting that brand image for EVERYONE who flies our flag…because we KNOW that a properly developed, cultivated and maintained brand image DOES HAVE VALUE.

      Thanks again, James. I appreciate the contributions you are making to the #RTB dialogue…

      Best,
      Michael

  • You can’t raise the bar until you have a bar. Good post from @ProfessionalOnehttp://cli.gs/mUaPZ #rtb

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Step Up! @ProfessionalOne raises our own bar. Is this high enough? http://cli.gs/mUaPZ #rtb

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • @ginakay Agree in theory, but not as it relates to our industry. “Discussion” will lead to no change. Have U read this? http://cli.gs/mUaPZ

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Lack of cohesion, high level of denial and no leadership. Oh my, how surprising.

    Not really surprising at all if you think about it. The core of the problem is that the industry has organized itself around the fear of having to provide benefits or be exposed to payroll taxes for the agents. Yes, the Independent Contractor designation and the IRS are the elephants in the room.

    As independent contractors, agents are by law not team players. They do as they please, when they please and where they please. And if they sell a few houses a year, then they want all the money. If the brokerage goes under, so what. On to the next one.

    High level of denial. Well, of course. I was told by a broker last month that the Independent Contractor designation is for the benefit of the agent, not the brokerage [excuse me for laughing]. The agent is allowed to have rich tax deductions that he or she would not have but for the NAR fighting in Congress to keep the Independent Contractor designation for the agents[this is where I say "give me a break"].

    No leadership. No surprise. If a broker tells me what to do I promise to call IRS. I am an independent Contractor and you can tell me to sell only houses under your banner [as opposed to apples], but that is as far as it goes. Mr. Broker, you can ask me to do things, but you had better not tell me where, when or how. Otherwise, you might just end up paying payroll taxes!

    I know, I know. So what is my solution to this mess? The honest answer is that I am not sure. I am told that selling homes using employees as opposed to independent contractors has been tried and failed. The low producing agents flock to the “employee” companies[why would a company hire a low producer?] and the high producers want to remain independent contractors so they can maintain financial leverage over the brokers.

    I can, however, envision a company creating an atmosphere for its employees such that high producers would want to become part of the team.
    Great companies in other industries do that all the time. When do we start?

    Tyler Webb
    Champion Realty
    Annapolis, MD
    http://www.recrab.com
    @REcrab

  • Michael, this is great, and a great way for someone to actually take action on it. I think as an active fulltime agent that we need to RTB, but the I think that is different for everyone. For me it is not all about education and designations it really is much more simple, it is about the basics.
    Put the right address in the MLS
    Take a few good pictures to use with the home
    Answer a call or email when another agent asks if there are offers on the house or calls for information
    If you are not putting the lockbox code in the realtor notes in the MLS then answer the call or let us know quickly what the code is when we leave a message.
    Read the MLS before you call for info on a house because what you are asking may be answered there.
    Dont put a house as active with a lockbox if you have not had a chance to get out and put on a lockbox yet.
    These and basic functions like this could make our job a lot better.
    .-= Dean Ouellette´s last blog ..Top 10 real estate posts of the day for 4/16/2010 =-.

  • Most of the #rtb discussion is a bunch of crap spewed by people that (1) are not actually practicing real estate (2) have something to gain by people considering “raising the bar,” namely them being hired as the marketing firm for the brokerage hoping to #rtb.

    I’ve hated the discussion not only because of the people trying to rally for its traction but because of what’s actually being discussed- most of it is fluffy feel-good stuff perfect for a Lifetime movie but not useful in the practice of real estate.

    YOUR article however, breaks the mold. I applaud your bravery for stepping forth and putting your means to raise the bar in the public eye, it’s a great list and hopefully others will follow suit. I love it!!!!
    .-= Lani Rosales´s last blog ..Goldman fraud charges are just the beginning- this will get ugly =-.

  • Lani,

    Simply put: Thank you!

    We’ve found that actions DO speak louder than words…

  • Having recently (four years ago) joined the real estate industry I could not agree more with your perspective.

    Prior to jumping into the real estate market, I ran a large, international technology company serving over 12,000 clients in 48 countries. The reason I was interested in jumping into the real estate pool was that from the outside we felt that we could bring technology and process that have been in place in other industries for years and contribute to the changes that are needed to professionalize the real estate marketing and transaction process.

    Had we known how many opportunities there would be to pick low hanging fruit to help our agents and brokers stand out and better serve their clients, we would have done it years earlier.

    The future is very, very bright for the industry and I for one am thrilled to be part of redefining both the ante and differenciated service offerings that will win in the future.

    Dan Duffy
    Chairman and CEO
    United Country Real Estate

  • Step Up | Plymouth, MI real estate company dramatically increases “barrier to entry” for its agents | http://cli.gs/mUaPZ

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Raising the Bar I How High?!? http://ow.ly/1BYqm via @ProfessionalOne #RTB

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Congrats, Michael! Looking forward to what you guys produce.

    Just one small thought for you and the management team to consider as you pursue this.

    Consider offering a flat fee service to the clients. I’m more convinced than ever that as long as realtors are seen as commissioned salespeople who have a vested interest in the transaction, they won’t be seen as objective advisors by the consumer, no matter what the reality of the situation is. It’s amazing how many selfless, professional realtors I know, and yet they’re just simply tarred and feathered by the media and by the public as “oh, you just want to cash a check”.

    Just a thought that you might consider offering that as an option.

    -rsh
    .-= Rob Hahn´s last blog ..Rob Hahn, 7DS and MRIS. The Whole Story… =-.

    • Rob,

      We have experimented with the flat fee service option over the last few years, in varying offerings and in varying packages.

      Long story short: the jury is still out, but here’s what we think we’ve learned so far:

      *Attempting to use flat fee to undercut the competition purely on price is a losing proposition and an unfettered “race to the bottom” that no one can win. When you compete on price and price alone, you’ve set sail straight for the edge of Niagara Falls. We’ve watched a number of pure “low cost flat fee” models enter our market, and we’ve watched them devour one another with a consistent ratcheting-down of their listing prices. Several of these companies have already folded. One lasted less than six months;

      *We’ve used a hybrid option with some success; that is, a flat fee plus a reduced percentage commission rate. That has been quite well received by the sellers to whom we’ve offered this option. We’re still trying to fine-tune that particular option, but the public seems to like it;

      *Talking narrowly on this flat fee issue alone, we think the right approach is probably a “moderate flat fee” that does represent a cost savings to a typical client, but which is not so low as to make it obvious that no real service could possibly be provided (which is the strategic mistake that I think most of the flat fee brokerages have made). People KNOW you can’t really do anything for $499 or $299 or whatever the bargain-basement-rate-de-jour happens to be. The right mix is probably “great, professional service at a reasonable discount,” as opposed to “zero or near-zero service at a huge discount.”

      Having said those things, I do agree with your larger point, which is that Realtors are for the most part perceived as selfishly motivated salespeople. We already covered that one in our post at http://p1fran.com/2010/01/the-people-have-spoken/.

      Thanks for the comment, Rob. We always enjoy hearing your perspectives on such things…

      Best,
      Michael

  • Rob,

    I need to respectfully disagree on your point about commissions. In my opinion, the real problem with our industry is competency of the agents. Agents do not keep in touch with clients [this is the most common complaint I hear day in and day out], they do not know the market in which they work, they cannot fill in a few blanks in a contract form, and, worst of all, there is no one who can require them to do otherwise.

    My experience is that sellers are more than willing to pay the fees if they receive professional service and advice on the way to achieving their goals. As I see it, Sellers are not looking for cheaper, they are looking for professional advice and service.

    Tyler Webb
    Associate Broker
    Champion Realty
    http://www.recrab.com
    @recrab

    • Tyler,

      Thanks for your comment.

      I agree with your observations, and I don’t think they are necessarily in conflict with Rob’s comments.

      Part of the problem we have in real estate is REALITY. That is, we’ve let in way too many unqualified people with our ridiculously low barrier to entry and then we wonder why they provide substandard service and keep us at the bottom of the Harris Polls. This is the issue you address.

      And then there is PERCEPTION, which is what I think Rob is talking about. And as long as there is a direct connection between “sales price” and “Realtor paycheck, this perception – RIGHT OR WRONG, FAIR OR UNFAIR – that Realtors are driven first and foremost by greed (and not necessarily by more honorable motivations like professionalism, excellent and client service) will likely continue.

      But I absolutely agree with your final comment, which is that clients ARE without questions looking for “PROFESSIONAL advice and service.”

      And that’s precisely what we’re trying to give them…

      Best,
      Michael

  • @ProfessionalOne Read Raising the Bar I How High?!? http://ow.ly/1BYqm Good Stuff, so curious, ur thoughts on training newbies? #RTB

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • Michael,

    I understand your point and it is well taken. I do, however, continue to be of the opinion that in the case of real estate agents, the “perception” is based on the “reality”. You aptly define the “reality”.

    I am confident that when we solve the reality challenge, compensation will not be an issue. Again, in all professions [I come out of the law profession]it is my experience that professional service that helps the client achieve their goals trumps price every time. As a rel estate agent, I just do not hear, “you did a great job, but you got paid too much for doing it”.

    If an agent wants to charge less, so be it. It happens all the time. But doing so will not “raise the bar” once fraction of an inch.

    Good discussion, thanks.

    Tyler

  • I have never understood the logic of an agent taking the seller’s money and giving it to the buyer. What is the rationale for that? If an agent thinks he or she is overpaid it would seem to make more sense to give it back to the seller who was apparently “overcharged”.

    Tyler Webb
    Associate Broker
    Champion Realty
    http://www.recrab.com
    @recrab
    .-= Tyler Webb´s last blog ..3 Parts to the Question: How’s the Market? =-.

  • AbsolutelyRT @ProfessionalOne #RTB | Raising the Bar | How High?!? http://cli.gs/2jQrE

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • May 2010 Realtor Mag Reader’s Poll: 65% say brokerages should have “MUCH HIGHER” bar for entry | This high enough? http://cli.gs/mUaPZ

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • @TomRoyce Our high barrier to entry significantly minimizes the risk of this happening | http://cli.gs/mUaPZ | #RTB

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • @TomRoyce That’s been discussed. Problem: too many conflicting interests, as explained at http://cli.gs/mUaPZ | #RTB

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • I think that it’s quite unfortunate that many of us don’t appreciate the opportunities we have in our industry. Real estate brokerage is truly an equal opportunity business where one’s success is based on merit, hard-work, creativity, and an individuals’ personal skills, abilities, and knowledge. This is in contrast to many of today’s jobs – especially in corporate America where your financial future is in the hands of your boss or company executives.

    However, earlier real estate practitioners saw the downsides of working for a corporation (way before the Great Depression and Great Recession) so they structured the industry differently. The real estate brokerage industry was never designed to model after corporations or the typical employee platform that many of us have become accustomed to today. In fact, real estate brokerage was being practiced profitably (albeit there were still problems) before becoming an organized industry in the early 20th Century.

    Think pre-Industrial Age – before there was such a thing as a JOB. Think cottage industries and small businesses. Doing so will provide some insight into the mentality of earlier practitioners. In their minds, real estate brokerage was a “business profession.” It was a profession that encouraged self-reliance and independence during an age when the corporation was wiping out smaller industries and businesses (remember the mom-and-pops?). But not only were small businesses disappearing, so too was personal individuality and financial freedom.

    During the Industrial Age (even now), most people adopted the identity of their corporate “parent” in place of their own. Earlier real estate practitioners recognized this. Many of them also believed working for a corporation was a subservient endeavor. Hence, the reason for the lack of hierarchy in the industry. The real estate agent is an independent business person (in most cases) just like the brokerage firm owner. And there’s not an agent who’s been practicing more than two years who can’t open his/her own brokerage shop and sponsor other agents. Or become a broker while still being affiliated with a broker. So, the conventional corporate hierarchy is really non-existent.

    The lack of industry-wide cohesion and ease of entry is a consequence of the industry being organized by entrepreneurs, free-minded individuals, and business people. Why should that be a bad thing?

    Ileri Ogunfiditimi, REALTOR
    Ileri Ogunfiditimi LLC/Jobin Realty
    7825 Tuckerman Lane, Suite 201
    Potomac MD 20854
    Direct Dial: 240-403-3400, ext 742

  • Michael,

    Those are some serious standards and I’m proud to know someone willing to take those steps to #RTB.

    Here’s my only problem:

    Who’s left to train and help newer agents grow and develop into agents that would be #RTB agents?

    Obviously there are those out there who seek out and develop relationships with people like you and Todd – so that we can learn from your experiences and knowledge, but what aboutthose that are left to learn from brokers who just want to keep the status quo? Is there then a possibility that the industry might leave some future great agents behind – only because they didn’t have the rights tools and teachers to start?

    My broker took a chance with me. She doesn’t just hire 100 agents and hope one performs. She is hand picking her office, one agent at a time. And she picked me – untried, untested, unproven. Yet she knew I had “the right stuff” – I just needed that step up. I still have a long climb to truly meet my potential, so my question is – should she have left me to a “warm butt empty seat” broker? Would Porfessional One see a glimmer and put their neck on the line for the right agent?

    I know you believe that #RTB can be developed within agents from both their inner desires as well as being “taught” to them. So which rules over which?
    Matt Stigliano´s last [type] ..For Sale By Owner For San Antonio Sellers

    • Michael McClure

      Matt,

      Our view is that a real estate brokerage exists first and foremost to provide superior service to its CLIENTS, NOT to make sure that every agent has a “fair chance” to be a member of that company.

      We fully understand that we’re going to miss out on a few good agents here and there because of our dramatically heightened barrier to entry.

      But whatever we lose in terms of a few quality agents will be more than offset by virtue of our elevated profile, image and reputation in the minds of the people that matter the most in this conversation. Not brokers and not agents, but our clients.

      Yes, we understand that our approach may feel “backwards” to you and to many other agents.

      And we are OK with that, because, again, we exist to serve the CLIENT, NOT THE REALTOR.

      Further, by having a traditional barrier to entry – read, NONE – to capture the few good agents we may exclude, don’t forget that there are HEAVY costs associated with that “open door” philosophy: a diluted brand image, a lot of marginally performing agents and a brand that ultimately does not matter. Like we see demonstrated vividly here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka8GaXU2t2w.

      We’re not trying to build a “big” company. We’re going to build a GREAT company…

      You can read more about our branding philosophies at http://p1fran.com/2010/05/p1-branding-differentiation/.

      Thanks for your comment, Matt.

      Todd and I appreciate you very much…

      Best,
      Michael

  • Ileri – Although I agree somewhat, I have to question the thought that the rewards go to agents/brokerages based on hard work and merit. I’ve seen one too many slip-shod top producers. I’m not saying they’re all “bad seeds” but you do have to admit that there are those in the industry who can talk their way into any listing, do a poor job marketing it, and yet still sell the home and look “professional” while doing it. On the flip side I’ve seen hard working, caring, ethical, honest agents flounder when they couldn’t get their foot in the door to the club of locally entrenched household names.

    Perhaps that can be blamed on the agents poor personal branding and marketing, bit similar to what I wrote earlier to Michael – how do we compensate for the new agent who might have the right stuff, but has not received or made the opportunity that will eventually set their names in stone at the agent hall of fame?
    Matt Stigliano´s last [type] ..For Sale By Owner For San Antonio Sellers

  • As a Human Resources Consultant for the Real Estate industry I seriously appreciate you wanting to RTB. RTB has always been a hot topic of mine even as a Real Estate Recruiter and Career Development person. It is shocking the number of real estate companies who still do not take the high road when asking individuals to join their organization.

    What I have found is there are several schools of thought (for example a few listed here).
    1) A particular national organization makes more income from the shear volume of “agents” in the business who are part of their affiliation. This national organization seems not to give a hoot (could care less)if an agent is trained well or qualified to represent our industry. If they did one would think they would raise the standards and increase their association fees to make up the difference and keep 90% of the non-performing individuals out of this profession.

    2) Another simple example is some real estate organizations (both small and large) have never taken the time to set minimum hiring standards for themselves. Yes they all have “recruiting” goals and are compensated as such. By simply keep the revolving door going, which damages their market value with consumers and more importantly reduces retention of good professional real estate sales people, they try and meet the demands of their owners by “recruiting all the time”. I am surprised we don’t have more manager burn-out in our industry.

    3) Many real estate companies say they want to be different but very few ever put into action the “what makes them so special” difference. What makes the good companies different from the average or not so good are their Associates and employees. And even that begins at the point of hire or affiliation. Same ole’ thing…..

    In closing, I applaud your efforts especially since you believe in Assessment programs such the “Merit Profile” character assessment. While our tool does not measure character it does measure SALES SKILLS, COGNITIVE ABILITY and PERSONALITY as it pertains to success in real estate sales. Our company would be happy to offer you a few free assessments to help some of your outstanding agents. You are welcome to contact me via email or look me up and call me. I hope to hear from you!

    Thanks again for a discussion on what seems to never go any further than a blog or article entry….hiring the right people and having minimum standards will set you apart!!!Bi Business have known this for years..why do you think you have to “interview for the job\position” or “get regular performance reviews”…..

    • Michael McClure

      Maria,

      I agree with EVERYTHING you’ve said. You sound like my alter ego!

      We should talk sometime about how your company might be able to help us grow and participate in our revenue stream (we have such a program already established), particularly given that our overall philosophies are so closely aligned.

      Thanks for your comment!

      Best,
      Michael

  • I like your statement that the real estate industry is fragmented. This can be both a good and bad thing. It’s good in that it feeds competition and therefore better service.
    MLS´s last [type] ..Las Vegas MLS

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge
Login with Facebook: